STAR:

Study of the Tsunami Aftermath and Recovery in Sumatra, Indonesia

 

On December 26, 2004 a massive earthquake struck in the Indian Ocean, spawning a tsunami that slammed into the nearby island of Sumatra and caused unparalleled devastation. The tsunami subsequently traveled across the Indian Ocean wreaking havoc on coastal areas throughout the region. Worldwide, casualties number around a quarter of a million people.

 

Major efforts of relief and rebuilding are underway in the affected countries, but recovery is expected to take years and little is known about what programs are likely to be effective once initial needs for medical care, food, clothing, and shelter are met. By systematically collecting information on the full range of costs to individuals, families, and communities, and on the ways in which they reconstruct their lives and livelihoods in the aftermath of the disaster, we will provide important insights into the nature of programs that will be effective in the medium-term in Sumatra and in responses to future large-scale disasters. We are conducting a study in Indonesia with funding from the World Bank, the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the MacArthur Foundation, which is designed to speak to these issues.

 

Goals

We have three main goals. First, using longitudinal survey data collected before and after the disaster, we will document the immediate and medium term consequences of the disaster for mortality, family disruption and relocation, and physical and mental health. Second, we will trace the reconstruction of lives and livelihoods in the aftermath of the disaster, paying particular attention to the roles of kinship and social networks, community strength, and receipt and leveraging of external aid. Third, we will identify the characteristics of individuals, households and communities that are associated with resilience to the deleterious consequences of the disaster.

 

Approach

Our project builds on a large-scale nationally representative socio-economic survey, SUSENAS, that is collected annually by Statistics Indonesia (BPS). Each year a new cross-section of respondents is selected to be representative at the district level. With the permission of BPS we are recontacting respondents first interviewed in February, 2004 in the affected districts of Aceh and North Sumatra. Because we are interviewing respondents who, at the time of the tsunami, resided at varying distances from the beachfront and at various altitudes, our interviews will capture experiences ranging from physical devastation and loss of life, to far more muted effects of infrastructure damage and price changes, to very few effects for those living further inland and further south. This variation is important as it will allow us to compare change over time for those who bore the brunt of the tsunami's impact, to change over time for individuals considerably further from harm's way.

 

The impact of the tsunami will be measured by re-interviewing SUSENAS respondents who were living in areas that were damaged (and in some areas that were not) and collecting the same information on the health, socio-demographic and economic status of each individual that was collected in 2004. The 2004 SUSENAS is an excellent baseline for this project for two reasons.

 

First, because sample sizes in each year are large, the data from 2004 consist of interviews with over 11,000 households and over 45,000 people. All of these respondents are being tracked in follow-up surveys in 2005-2007, including those who have moved away from the study site. Special efforts will be made to identify people who have died and to follow orphans and older adults who might have moved to live with other family.

 

Second, the 2004 SUSENAS questionnaire was extremely detailed.  In this wave information on morbidities and use of health care of each household member, along with detailed information on household economic resources, was collected from all households.  In addition, one-quarter of households were administered an additional instrument which collected information on general health status, psycho-social health, injuries and symptoms associated with various diseases.  At the household level, additional detail about spending on health was gathered along with extensive information on the quality, location and ownership of housing and land, the quality of the environment, including the availability and quality of water.  We are repeating the SUSENAS questions and adding additional questions given the subsequent disaster. 

 

In addition to reinterviewing the SUSENAS households, we are conducting detailed interviews with community informants, including the village leader, in each of the survey communities, and with providers of health care and other forms of aid.  These interviews will provide information on the availability of assistance from local community organizations and from national and international entities, and on the degree of physical destruction in the community. 

 

The tsunami’s impact and factors that protected from it

 

Mortality serves as the most basic indicator of the tsunami’s effects.  We will construct age-, gender-, and location-specific rates of death, comparing areas more and less affected by the tsunami.  We will also provide estimates of, among other things, the number of orphans and their age, composition, their location and living arrangements as well as the number of older people who are left without family support in their later years. 

 

Similar descriptions will be provided for a number of indicators of well-being.  At the individual level, this includes the incidence of physical injuries, a battery of indicators of psycho-social health problems, morbidities, symptoms of post-traumatic stress syndrome, depression, and anxiety, and more general health difficulties.  The extent to which people relocated – and where they relocated, with whom they lived and if and when they returned to their pre-tsunami location will be measured.  We will consider the extent to which family – or extended family— are able to buffer the impact of the tsunami by determining, for example, with whom orphans are living.  Economic and social disruption will be measured by identifying loss of family and community resources, loss of jobs and businesses, changes in income.  Changes in real levels of household expenditures provide a very good indicator of immediate changes in the well-being of all household members, whereas changes in levels of wealth are indicative of longer-run effects of the tsunami.  Loss of housing and land, as well as infrastructure at the community level will be described.

 

Community level damage will be summarized drawing on two sources of data.  First, using satellite images of the coastline, available from NASA, in conjunction with GPS-based location information which we will collect for each village in the survey, it will be possible to measure the extent of physical destruction and the pace of recovery.  We will quantify the land area in each village that was inundated with water and obtain estimates of vegetation damage.  The satellite images below illustrate this approach.  The lefthand image shows one area of Aceh, Indonesia on January 10, 2004—about one year before the tsunami struck.  The righthand image shows the same area on December 29, 2004—3 days after the tsunami struck.  It is a fundamentally different place.  The degree of change can be quantified by using the data in the photographs to construct indices of the Normalized Digitized Vegetation Index before and after the tsunami.  Measures will be obtained for all survey communities (approximately 750), thus allowing us to assess the association between the degree of environmental devastation and changes in health and well-being.

 

Satellite Images of coast of Aceh, before and after the Tsunami

 

Satellite images

 

Additionally, we are collecting detailed information at the community level on the extent of infrastructure damage and on the availability and cost of various services, both immediately after the tsunami and at the time of the interview.  We also obtain information about changes in land use from local village leaders.  In addition to this information on destruction and rebuilding within the community, we ask about receipt of aid and assistance within and from outside the community, as well as the emergence or reappearance of local community welfare institutions.   These data allow us to relate the pace of post-tsunami recovery to the availability of aid, controlling for the magnitude of the tsunami’s effects as indicated by the satellite-derived measures of changes in vegetation and land use.

 

Project Team

The project team includes three U.S.-based researchers, Elizabeth Frankenberg, Jed Friedman, and Duncan Thomas, and three Indonesian researchers, Bondan Sikoki, Wayan Suriastini, and Cecep Sumantri.  Frankenberg, a demographer and sociologist, and Thomas, an economist, are based at the University of California, Los Angeles.  Friedman, an economist, is based at the World Bank.  Sikoki, a demographer, is the director of SurveyMeter, the NGO that will carry out the fieldwork.  Suriastini and Sumantri, trained in public policy and public health, respectively, are research associates at SurveyMeter.  All five team members have worked together for over a decade and have a long history of collaborating on the design and fielding of the surveys in Indonesia, writing research reports, and publishing papers.