Q8. Based on the effectiveness of instruction (clarity, expertise, enthusiasm, rigor, support, inspiration, etc.) overall the instructor, Duncan Thomas, was: | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Econ 204 | Econ undergrads | All undergrads | |||||||||
Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median |
94 | 4.33 | 1.01 | 5.00 | 1,266 | 4.21 | 1.04 | 5.00 | 20,008 | 4.22 | 0.98 | 5.00 |
Distribution of responses in Econ 204 | |||||||||||
Options | 5.Excellent | 4.Very good | 3.Average | 2.Marginal | 1.Poor | ||||||
% of students | 58% | 27% | 7% | 4% | 3% |
Q7. Considering all components of the course (lectures, discussions, sections/labs, assessments, projects, course environment, etc.) overall the course was: | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Econ 204 | Econ undergrads | All undergrads | |||||||||
Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median |
94 | 3.99 | 1.06 | 4.00 | 1,165 | 3.86 | 1.02 | 4.00 | 16,575 | 4.06 | 0.95 | 4.00 |
Distribution of responses in Econ 204 | |||||||||||
Response option | 5.Excellent | 4.Very good | 3.Average | 2.Marginal | 1.Poor | ||||||
% of students | 38% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 4% |
Q1. Your personal engagement with the course was: | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Econ 204 | Econ undergrads | All undergrads | |||||||||
Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median |
92 | 4.00 | 0.98 | 4.00 | 1,172 | 3.64 | 1.01 | 4.00 | 16,660 | 3.98 | 0.91 | 4.00 |
Distribution of responses in Econ 204 | |||||||||||
Response option | 5.Very high | 4.High | 3.Medium | 2.Low | 1.Very low | ||||||
% of students | 39% | 29% | 25% | 5% | 1% |
Q5. The course was intellectually stimulating. It made me think in new ways, encouraged me to adopt different points of view, or challenged me to develop new skills. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Econ 204 | Econ undergrads | All undergrads | |||||||||
Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median |
Distribution of responses in Econ 204 | |||||||||||
95 | 4.34 | 0.96 | 5.00 | 1,165 | 3.92 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 16,508 | 4.13 | 0.91 | 4.00 |
Response option | 5.Excellent | 4.Very good | 3.Average | 2.Marginal | 1.Poor | ||||||
% of students | 56% | 32% | 6% | 3% | 3% |
Q12. The course was difficult. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Econ 204 | Econ undergrads | All undergrads | |||||||||
Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median |
94 | 4.61 | 0.55 | 5.00 | 1,154 | 3.10 | 1.22 | 3.00 | 16,578 | 3.19 | 1.13 | 3.00 |
Distribution of responses in Econ 204 | |||||||||||
Response option | 5.Strongly agree | 4.Agree | 3.Neither agree nor disagree | 2.Disagree | 1.Strongly disagree | ||||||
% of students | 64% | 33% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
Q13. How many hours in a typical week did you spend on this class (outside of class meetings)? | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Econ 204 | Econ undergrads | All undergrads | |||||||||
Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median | Number | Mean | Std | Median |
95 | 7.56 | 2.12 | 8.00 | 1,165 | 4.31 | 2.34 | 4.00 | 16,605 | 4.38 | 2.42 | 4.00 |
Distribution of responses in Econ 204 | |||||||||||
Response option | 10+ hrs | 9 hrs | 8 hrs | 7 hrs | 6 hrs | 5 hrs | 4 hrs | 3 hrs | 2 hrs | 1 hr | |
% of students | 31% | 7% | 17% | 12 | 9% | 16% | 7% | 1% | 0% | 0% |